Regional Strategies for Wind Power Participating States/Provinces: Eastern Montana and Eastern Washington Length of Project: 2 years Amount of Award: $108,000 For more information, please contact , South Central Washington Program Director, The Nature Conservancy
Wind facilities are not stand-alone features—they cover vastly more area than the footprint of the turbines, requiring extensive road systems and transmission corridors. In order to meet power generation goals, national wind power development will continue to increase and occur over millions of acres Wind energy development has progressed with very little science-based policy analysis to examine costs of biodiversity impacts. Further, since wind power projects are proposed individually, cumulative impacts at regional scales are left unaddressed. To counter better known environmental impacts, some states, such
as Washington, have adopted a regulatory framework to review wind
projects on an ad-hoc basis, whereas most states, such as Montana,
lack any regulation and generally rely on wind energy producers to
essentially regulate themselves through suggested guidelines for siting
turbines. Industry has, in the past, used contract science to try
to demonstrate no or low impact from facilities. Mixed credibility
has been given to the results from industry science regarding biodiversity
impacts. Regulatory agencies have little ability to provide proactive
science guidance on wind power production, and are viewed with suspicion
by industry. The Nature Conservancy has the ability to offer an “honest
broker” approach to the pressing need for displaying the interactions
between wind power production and biodiversity. Industry representatives
have stated their interest in knowing, in advance and in more detail
than currently available, those areas of highest wind potential that
also have the highest biodiversity values.
Achievements to Date:
|




General Significance of Project: